What should authors do in the discussion section of a research paper?

In the discussion section of a research paper, it is essential for authors to clearly differentiate between significant and non-significant results. This practice is critical for accurately interpreting the findings of the research and providing a comprehensive understanding of the implications of the study. By making this distinction, authors can explain the relevance of each result, contextualize the significant findings within the broader field of study, and address the limitations posed by non-significant results.

Highlighting both types of results fosters transparency and enhances the credibility of the research. It allows readers to grasp the complexities and nuances of the findings, which can lead to a more informed understanding of the implications for practice or further research. Furthermore, accurately reporting non-significant results is vital, as it contributes to the body of knowledge and prevents publication bias that favors only significant findings.

This approach supports the scientific method's core principles, encouraging ongoing investigation and exploration of the subject. In contrast, simply presenting all results without differentiation, suggesting only significant results, or presenting non-significant results as if they are important would obscure the true nature of the research and potentially mislead readers.